From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d77ef9d82defaba
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-02 08:30:23 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!204.127.161.2.MISMATCH!wn2feed!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!128.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Enforcing byte-wide access to memory
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 16:22:35 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <92sv84$32n$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <3a51f063_2@nnrp1.news.uk.psi.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jan 02 16:22:35 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x64.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3564
Date: 2001-01-02T16:22:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3a51f063_2@nnrp1.news.uk.psi.net>,
  "Nick Williams" <nwilliams@praxis-cs.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is there any way of enforcing that accesses to a particular
> region of memory be byte-wide?

No, this is definitely something that is in the implementation
dependent area. If you can isolate such references to a single
unit, then the cleanest thing is to use a machine code
insertion to ensure that the specific instruction you want
is generated.


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/