From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ab76c2183ecc054
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-01 15:50:45 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!xfer13.netnews.com!netnews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada to C Translator
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 23:38:38 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <92r4dv$nfm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <92fk1v0cou@drn.newsguy.com> <92fqlt$h8d$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <3A4CF58B.A8FF223C@collins.rockwell.com> <alpl29.aph.ln@leia>
 <92qfj7$7l9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A50EFE2.7DA62AD4@online.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 01 23:38:38 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x66.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3532
Date: 2001-01-01T23:38:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3A50EFE2.7DA62AD4@online.no>,
  "Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen" <tarjei@online.no> wrote:
> Robert Dewar wrote:
> >
> > Again, that is unsupported FUD. I am the last person to
write
> > strong words of support for NT, but to say that NT has
reached
> > end of life is absurd.
>
> Actually it is not. Microsoft will try its best to discourage
both new
> and old NT users and try to direct them to windows 2000.
Their plan to
> phase out NT 4 from the product line is rather agressive.
>
> Whether this plan will work as intended and in the time frame
they hope
> for is an open question. However they will try.
>
> Greetings,

OK, If you are making this big a differentiation between NT
and Win2K, then that's fine, but basically I simply regard
Win2K as a renaming of NT 5, so I don't make this distinction.

Sure, the *name* NT is at end of life :-)

I would not count on the *name* Win2000 being used for the
next version of the OS, so this name is also at EOL :-)




Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/