In article <3A50EFE2.7DA62AD4@online.no>,
  "Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen" <tarjei@online.no> wrote:
> Robert Dewar wrote:
> >
> > Again, that is unsupported FUD. I am the last person to
write
> > strong words of support for NT, but to say that NT has
reached
> > end of life is absurd.
>
> Actually it is not. Microsoft will try its best to discourage
both new
> and old NT users and try to direct them to windows 2000.
Their plan to
> phase out NT 4 from the product line is rather agressive.
>
> Whether this plan will work as intended and in the time frame
they hope
> for is an open question. However they will try.
>
> Greetings,

OK, If you are making this big a differentiation between NT
and Win2K, then that's fine, but basically I simply regard
Win2K as a renaming of NT 5, so I don't make this distinction.

Sure, the *name* NT is at end of life :-)

I would not count on the *name* Win2000 being used for the
next version of the OS, so this name is also at EOL :-)




Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/