From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ab76c2183ecc054 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-28 12:20:19 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!portc01.blue.aol.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: gdemont@my-deja.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada to C Translator Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 20:11:37 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <92g6pk$s22$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <92fk1v0cou@drn.newsguy.com> <92fqlt$h8d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.153.188.2 X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Dec 28 20:11:37 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.73 [en] (Win98; I) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 proxy.rega-sense.ch:3128 (Squid/2.3.STABLE4), 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 10.2.1.129, 194.153.188.2 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDgdemont Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3434 Date: 2000-12-28T20:11:37+00:00 List-Id: TED: > You might as well take all your C code and rewrite it in Assembler > while you are at it. Beside the question of downgrading all modern software to the old PDP-7 macro-assembler, tranlslating directly to assembler can be the best solution (price, time) in some cases. Some Ada compilers can output assembler, so you can wrap the procedures in ASM statements and send the fresh new C code in time. The main difficulty people find in the exercise is the name visibility. Even with a C++ compiler, with working namespaces it seems very difficult to transform the easy unambiguous name visibility into a pre-Pascalian context. Good luck Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/