From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e3fa322e453b2f9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-28 08:20:07 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!cyclone.bc.net!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: www.adahome.com?...
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 16:12:31 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <92fop9$fn8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <3a491263_3@news3.prserv.net> <92d6cb$g57$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <92fens$7je$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a4b456f_3@news3.prserv.net>
 <92fmis$dn1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.48.27.130
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Dec 28 16:12:31 2000 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US;
 m18) Gecko/20001207
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x67.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3425
Date: 2000-12-28T16:12:31+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <92fmis$dn1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
> In article <3a4b456f_3@news3.prserv.net>,
>   "Andrzej Lewandowski" <lewandoREMOVE@attglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> > "Robert Dewar" <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> > news:92fens$7je$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > > In article <92d6cb$g57$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > >   Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > No, but it may be fair to say that it reflects the status
> of
> > > > the AJPO. My understanding is that every bit of work done
> on
> > > > adahome was funded by the DoD.
> > >
> > > Your understanding is incomplete, and this is false and
> > > misleading information.
> > >
> >
> > If this is the case, could you please provide complete and
> true information?
>
> OK, here is the information: the work on adahome.com was not
> entirely funded by the AJPO as you claim. I do not know the

Uhhh, that would probably be rather tough for Andrzej, as he never made
that claim in the first place. Please get snitty at the guilty party
(me) rather than some innocent but curious bystander.

As for me, I never stated it as fact, only as "my understanding". If I
was claiming it to be a fact as you try to imply I was doing, then I
would not have qualified the statement.

> origin of your claim, and so I cannot refute it in detail!
> Perhaps it is you who should cite the source for your original
> post :-)

Again, it was *my* post, and the source of my (mis?)understanding was
one of the last postings that Magnus made here, on 12/16/1998, an exerpt
of which follows:

--
> My understanding is that www.adahome.com is no longer being
> maintained.

Incorrect.  The Ada Home is still being maintained.

Unfortunately, it is difficult to find people who work for free year
after year, even to expand and improve a popular Web site.

Now that the US government/DoD has stopped giving money to the
AJPO/AdaIC for Web presence, maybe there are companies willing to
sponsor the work that is needed to maintain such a site.

Santa Claus, are you out there?
--


--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/