From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e3fa322e453b2f9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-28 07:40:09 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!feeder.qis.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: www.adahome.com?...
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 15:34:52 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <92fmis$dn1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <3a491263_3@news3.prserv.net> <92d6cb$g57$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <92fens$7je$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a4b456f_3@news3.prserv.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.41
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Dec 28 15:34:52 2000 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.41
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3421
Date: 2000-12-28T15:34:52+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3a4b456f_3@news3.prserv.net>,
  "Andrzej Lewandowski" <lewandoREMOVE@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
> "Robert Dewar" <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:92fens$7je$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > In article <92d6cb$g57$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> >   Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
> >
> > > No, but it may be fair to say that it reflects the status
of
> > > the AJPO. My understanding is that every bit of work done
on
> > > adahome was funded by the DoD.
> >
> > Your understanding is incomplete, and this is false and
> > misleading information.
> >
>
> If this is the case, could you please provide complete and
true information?


OK, here is the information: the work on adahome.com was not
entirely funded by the AJPO as you claim. I do not know the
origin of your claim, and so I cannot refute it in detail!
Perhaps it is you who should cite the source for your original
post :-)


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/