From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,74b55538385b7366 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Vladimir Olensky" Subject: Re: Which is right here - GNAT or OA ? Date: 1999/06/05 Message-ID: <928569312.951.42@news.remarQ.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 485958482 References: <928083159.436.79@news.remarQ.com> <928174549.336.98@news.remarQ.com> <7iuqkc$ln6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <928529202.956.79@news.remarQ.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com X-Trace: 928569312.951.42 K3TLTKYJOA5C9C7F8C qube-02.us-ca.remarq.com Organization: Posted via RemarQ Communities, Inc. NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 07:55:12 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-06-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Vladimir Olensky wrote in message <928529202.956.79@news.remarQ.com>... >If (X_referenced_ object_Address NOT in CODE_ADDRESS_RANGE) and then > (X_referenced_ object_Address NOT in STACK_ADDRES_RANGE) and then > (X_referenced_ object_Address NOT in STATIC_DATA_ADDRESS_RANGE) and >then > (all other necessary checks) then > Deallocate_Referenced_Object; -- or raise name_exception here to be >close to RM > X:=null; >else > X:=null; >end; Sorry, I clicked my mouse in the wrong place. I should be: If (X_referenced_ object_Address NOT in CODE_ADDRESS_RANGE) and then (X_referenced_ object_Address NOT in STACK_ADDRES_RANGE) and then (X_referenced_ object_Address NOT in STATIC_DATA_ADDRESS_RANGE) and then (all other necessary checks) then Deallocate_Referenced_Object; X:=null; else X:=null; -- or raise name_exception here to be close to RM end; Regards, Vladimir Olensky