From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Pat Rogers" Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95 Date: 1999/04/29 Message-ID: <925405828.809.35@news.remarQ.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 472361531 References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <37278218.ADE17A46@lawson.com> <7g8390$225c@drn.newsguy.com> <7g8g5j$cmt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <925355990.675.30@news.remarQ.com> <7g9kef$aco$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g9s54$ho0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com X-Trace: 925405828.809.35 ZQQEGAZYHDE58C640C usenet1.supernews.com Organization: Software Arts & Sciences X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 17:10:28 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-04-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: wrote in message news:7g9s54$ho0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com... > In article <7g9kef$aco$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, > Robert Dewar wrote: > > In article <925355990.675.30@news.remarQ.com>, > > "Pat Rogers" wrote: > > > The ability to argue both sides is certainly one of your > > > signature characteristics! :-) > > > > > > (Said as a compliment.) > > > > Thank you, I take it as a compliment :-) > > > > Once John Goodenough and I were planning a debate at a > > SigAda meeting, where the topic would be announced in > > advance, but we would decide by a flip of a coin at the > > start of the session who would take which side, but we > > did not get around to following through. A pity, would > > have been fun :-) > > Frankly, I'm not sure anyone else would have noticed the difference. :-) Sometimes it would be noticeable. I have it on good authority that Robert was once told by Christine Anderson, prior to a meeting in which they were to convince some group of people that Ada 9X was a "good thing", words to the effect that "once we get them convinced don't switch sides!!". :-)