From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com>
Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95
Date: 1999/04/28
Message-ID: <925355990.675.30@news.remarQ.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 472134711
References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <37278218.ADE17A46@lawson.com>
 <7g8390$225c@drn.newsguy.com> <7g8g5j$cmt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com
X-Trace: 925355990.675.30 ZQQEGAZYHDEC0C640C usenet1.supernews.com
Organization: Software Arts & Sciences
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 03:19:50 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-04-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com> wrote in message
news:7g8g5j$cmt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com...
<snip>
> If you don't see that, then you are definitely missing
> something (in general in a technical argument if you cannot
> argue both sides of an issue, it means you don't understand
> it well enough to be arguing :-)

The ability to argue both sides is certainly one of your signature
characteristics!  :-)

(Said as a compliment.)


--
Pat Rogers                            Training and Consulting in:
http://www.classwide.com      Deadline Schedulability Analysis
progers@classwide.com       Software Fault Tolerance
(281)648-3165                        Real-Time/OO Languages