From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,43ae7f61992b3213 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf964ea4531e6af X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: philh@vision25.demon.co.uk (Phil Hunt) Subject: Re: GPL and "free" software Date: 1999/04/27 Message-ID: <925171876snz@vision25.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 471422916 References: <7fibd5$jc7$1@news2.tor.accglobal.net> <7fudch$hsv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3723c38b@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <7g2gqk$ffk$1@52-a-usw.rb1.blv.nwnexus.net> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!vision25.demon.co.uk X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 925211556 mail2news:18690 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk Organization: here Reply-To: philh@vision25.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1999-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7g2gqk$ffk$1@52-a-usw.rb1.blv.nwnexus.net> tzs@halcyon.com "Tim Smith" writes: > In article , wrote: > >Well B has done nothing wrong in selling C the software. Neither party can > >really sue B because B hasn't broken the licence (unless they refuse to > >give C the source code upon request). > > B broke the license by not telling C that the software was GPL'ed. AFAICT it is perfectly legal for B to to tell C this until after C has bought it; after all, that is what Linux vendors do with shrinkwrapped distrutions. -- Phil Hunt....philh@vision25.demon.co.uk