From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5412c98a3943e746
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.129.169 with SMTP id nx9mr22052415pbb.2.1331054759317;
        Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h9ni46599pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Verified compilers?
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <9207716.776.1331054644462.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynaz38>
References: <op.v91cleyiule2fv@douda-yannick> <jj3p5v$2tp$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.230.151.194
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1331054759 10927 127.0.0.1 (6 Mar 2012 17:25:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:25:59 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <jj3p5v$2tp$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=24.230.151.194;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-03-06T09:24:04-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, March 5, 2012 7:27:25 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote:
>
> In any case, no one is going to run out and totally rebuild their compiler 
> because someone has found a supposedly "better" architecture for it. There 
> were many such better architectures when I started out (supposely everything 
> was going to be table-driven and automatically generated), and they're all 
> long gone. No reason to assume that anything is different here.
> 
>                             Randy.

I seem to recall someone on this forum doing a table-driven approach, though it might have only been WRT tokenization...