From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpclisp!hpcladb!defaria
From: defaria@hpcladb.HP.COM (Andy DeFaria)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Re: "limitations" of conditional compilation
Message-ID: <920016@hpcladb.HP.COM>
Date: 15 Dec 89 20:05:53 GMT
References: <7398@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Calif. Language Lab
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>   Hmmm... how about:
>
>      ALIGNMENT_LENGTH : constant := 2;   -- or 4, or whatever...
>
>      for RECORD_1 use
>         record
>            FIELD_1 at 0 * ALIGNMENT_LENGTH range 0..15;
>            FIELD_2 at 1 * ALIGNMENT_LENGTH range 0..15;
>            ...
>         end record;
>
>   The general form of the "at" expression seems to qualify as a
>   static_simple_expression (by 4.9.7 & 4.4.2, plus a similar 
>   example is given in 13.4.9), and the coding of the for clause 
>   would seem to be relatively straightforward.

It's the old "who came first? the chicken or the egg" syndrone.  How do you
define ALIGNMENT_LENGTH?  Its 2 on some machines and 4 on others.