From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6d862eabdeb1fc4
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.84.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!news-out2.kabelfoon.nl!newsfeed.kabelfoon.nl!xindi.nntp.kabelfoon.nl!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Ada noob here! Is Ada widely used?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <jhaJn.4661$z%6.1650@edtnps83>
 <0e88de66-128c-48fd-9b9f-fdb4357f318a@z17g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>
 <hud0f9$n8u$1@speranza.aioe.org> <op.vdtlrvrlxmjfy8@garhos>
 <yvu10n9bap55$.1occbqoi8kamk$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <hudsf0$41p$1@speranza.aioe.org> <wcchblh9uw6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <C8306ECD.145F17%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <jie1slpi909j.152v5srl3et2y.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdvbh7ikule2fv@garhos>
 <dde6m0poz8y2$.159jnspm6e$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdvdn9scule2fv@garhos>
 <d00zdxzqkpyy$.b18v6dzye2v2.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdvk5jrdule2fv@garhos>
 <2o8vq76hpv1m.vs7m2beo23nz.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdvpd7wpule2fv@garhos>
 <1q5k4indthpli.1dn17o4ue4a15$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c0c1188$0$6887$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <op.vdw6zottz25lew@macpro-eth1.krischik.com>
 <4c0cd44f$0$6766$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <op.vdxkw4t2xmjfy8@garhos>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:27:45 +0200
Message-ID: <91w8y6qvtty4.16d1ujzrvbi44.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Jun 2010 15:27:45 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8c087405.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=kREL[90h@ANFJ3]dH>I?oEic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRA<`=YMgDjhgBE>BTRb^`4fK[6LHn;2LCVN7enW;^6ZC`D\`mfM[68DCCdVA17X=EJJI
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11413
Date: 2010-06-07T15:27:45+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:56:54 +0200, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote:

> Le Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:13:18 +0200, Georg Bauhaus  
> <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> a �crit:
>> DbC, however, has to do with designing components of the ship.
>> You can have rescue clauses (exception handlers)
>> in DbC.
> Yes, DnC is rather part of design than part of the application.
> 
> This may not be perfect (words to Dmitry), while this still help to focus  
> on design.

I fail to see how misleading stuff may focus on design. Executable
contracts is just rubbish. They will rather distract from design in favor
debugging. Ada was designed as a language of little or no debugging.
Unfortunately it rapidly loses the ground.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de