From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,32dcee4844599b87 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-20 12:50:07 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!router1.news.adelphia.net!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT Error message Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 20:36:23 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <91r586$kq3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <3A3D01EA.37CB440B@libertysurf.fr> <3A3F854A.4AAC16EB@averstar.com> <91ov30$s9g$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.41 X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Dec 20 20:36:23 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.41 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3293 Date: 2000-12-20T20:36:23+00:00 List-Id: In article , Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) wrote: > While a location reference to the declaration sounds quite > helpful in general, I would suggest that it be suppressed in > the case of those who have more than one Index_Type in scope, > giving them some encouragement to change their ways. > > This is for the (admittedly low probability) chance that _I_ > might have to maintain their code some day :-) Sounds like you might like the new warning flag -gnatwh in GNAT that prevents any hiding of names :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/