From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9fb8e2af320d5b3e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Bus error
References: 
 <0367891DA5DA7E408D42A860FA002F44B0CC48@sma2901.cr.eurocopter.corp>
 <mailman.10.1183113484.1644.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <1l4yqvxoid4n1.1u8eo4oo8ml4m$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4685280c$0$14869$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <tk9ak6o26vr7.15x8n04sjd359.dlg@40tude.net>
From: Markus E Leypold
 <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>
Organization: N/A
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:31:13 +0200
Message-ID: <91odix36xq.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2r9JDgpeqOuegFxZY5n0yhebVNA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.231.117
X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1183209660 88.72.231.117 (30 Jun 2007 15:21:00
 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16374
Date: 2007-06-30T15:31:13+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:44:22 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>
>> Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:35:28 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
>>> 
>>>> in Ada 95 you could do
>>>>
>>>> 	X : T renames Factory;
>>> 
>>> Yes, you're right. It should be illegal. Semantically it is same as
>>>
>>>    X : Integer renames 1; -- Illegal
>> 
>> I don't think that renaming an object is the same as renaming
>> a number literal because the literal isn't declared anywhere.
>> Wheras I could say that a returned object is declared as part
>> of the function declaration.
>
> Oh, if that is a problem then take this instead:
>
>     X : Integer renames -1; -- Still illegal, though not a literal
>
> But clearly your argument is nonsensical, literal is a syntactic element,

How about the difference between lvalues and rvalues?

- M