From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9dfd83e22ef315db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-15 17:40:12 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!216.227.56.88.MISMATCH!telocity-west!TELOCITY!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!news.tele.dk!144.212.100.101!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: exponentiation of fixed point or decimal Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 01:31:29 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <91eglh$vh9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <87hf46uah6.fsf@moon.mteege.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.41 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Dec 16 01:31:29 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.41 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3194 Date: 2000-12-16T01:31:29+00:00 List-Id: In article <87hf46uah6.fsf@moon.mteege.de>, Matthias Teege wrote: > > Moin, > > I have a question about exponentiation of fixed point typs. The > following code didnt compile because of the '**' operator is not > defined for fixed point typs. So I made a lot of type conversions from > my fixed point type to float Why on earth did you chose type Float, is 6 digits *really* enough accuracy for your "financial application"? Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/