From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,577df5d4a0e88785 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-15 17:30:14 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Bad coding standards Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 01:19:03 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <91efu3$v0h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.41 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Dec 16 01:19:03 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.41 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3191 Date: 2000-12-16T01:19:03+00:00 List-Id: In article , comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote: > --*********Table of Contents******** > Package Analyze_Type_Declaration renames > Semantics_For_RM_Ch_3.Analyze_Type_Declaration; > --*********End Table of Contents******** > --I presumed Analyze_Type_Declaration was a package This kind of garbage renaming might I suppose be useful in a system where you have trouble telling where an entity resides, but in a decent system where this information is immediately at hand I see no possible advantage in this kind of redundancy. In particular, repeating parameters of procedures in every unit using the procedure seems particularly ugly to me. Imagine the impact if you added a default parameter! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/