From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,577df5d4a0e88785 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-15 17:30:15 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Bad coding standards Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 01:16:48 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <91efps$uvi$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.41 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Dec 16 01:16:48 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.41 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3192 Date: 2000-12-16T01:16:48+00:00 List-Id: In article , comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote: > From: Bob Leif > To: SteveD et al. > --*********Table of Contents******** > Package Analyze_Type_Declaration renames > Semantics_For_RM_Ch_3.Analyze_Type_Declaration; > --*********End Table of Contents******** > --I presumed Analyze_Type_Declaration was a package No, of course not, it is a procedure within the package, so I think you missed the point here :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/