From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE, LOTS_OF_MONEY,MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Xref: utzoo comp.misc:3499 comp.lang.ada:1487 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ncar!noao!arizona!naucse!sbw From: sbw@naucse.UUCP (Steve Wampler) Newsgroups: comp.misc,comp.lang.ada Subject: How widespread is Ada now? Message-ID: <917@naucse.UUCP> Date: 22 Sep 88 00:35:52 GMT Organization: Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ List-Id: I just completed a conversation with someone who made some statements that surprised me a little. Not knowing much about this area, I'm appealing to you folks for some verification. (I'd rather not hear too many opinions on this stuff - I have enough of my own.) 1. The DoD is now turning down bids by companies solely because they are not specifying Ada as the programming language. (The particular example used was one involving a bid by a division of Honeywell.) 2. NASA, DoD, NBS (National Bureau of Standards) are all requiring Ada now (along with several other government agencies that I didn't take note of). 3. There is, right now, a 600,000 Ada programmer shortage. (I think this is the one that is I find most surprising.) 4. Universities that adopt an Ada-based computer science program are pretty much assured of obtaining several million dollars of grant support to do so, and that this has happened to every (most? many? some?) program that has done so. Well, what is the degree of truth in these statement? I'm surprised by 3 because I haven't seen all that many job ads requesting Ada, both on the Net and in magazines such as Computer World. There were other, similar, comments made, but I think the above is enough for you to get the drift. Please email me if possible, just to keep the flame wars down some. -- Steve Wampler {....!arizona!naucse!sbw}