From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.213.106 with SMTP id nr10mr4785477pbc.2.1335413956699;
        Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni99322pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: ytomino <aghia05@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <9174782.48.1335413559883.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbkc8>
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <9af5eaaa-1c48-4455-a8e8-39dd9ee8092d@ot8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
 <op.wdcj0snyule2fv@douda-yannick>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.150.55.69
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335413956 29785 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2012 04:19:16
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <op.wdcj0snyule2fv@douda-yannick>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=114.150.55.69;
 posting-account=Mi71UQoAAACnFhXo1NVxPlurinchtkIj
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-04-25T21:12:39-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:37:30 AM UTC+9, Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=EAne) w=
rote:
>=20
> The above may still present issues with overloading. Imagine X exist with=
 =20
> multiple signatures, for both I1 and I2: as your proposal does not refer =
=20
> the precise signature, this would still be ambiguous.

Really?
I think, compiler can select one of overloaded functions by other parameter=
s.

procedure X (Obj : I1);
procedure X (Obj : I1; Y : Integer);
procedure X (Obj : I2; Y : Integer); -- *1
procedure X (Obj : I2; Y : String);

overriding (I2.X) procedure X3 (Obj : T; Y : Integer);

Unquestionably, X3 is overriding *1.

> I did not checked, but I feel there already is a way to avoid this =20
> ambiguity, using a renaming for the different Xs, prior to the definition=
 =20
> of T.
>=20

Probably, I feel that renaming introduces new primitive, and old name may s=
tay.