From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,577df5d4a0e88785 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-12 16:51:14 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!news-fw.gip.net!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: constant string array Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:37:58 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <916gd6$dvc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <3A36AF4B.6B81DF78@acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.240 X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Dec 13 00:37:58 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x73.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.240 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3030 Date: 2000-12-13T00:37:58+00:00 List-Id: In article <3A36AFB.6B81DF78@acm.org>, Jeff Carter wrote: > I like parentheses whenever they make things clearer. > Sometimes this includes unnecessary parentheses, as in > > -(2 ** 31) It is of course a consensus point that the use of parens in cases like this is not only allowable, but often preferable. But as Jeff notes, this has nothing whatever to do with junk parens that have no effect whatsoever under any circumstances. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/