From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7ceb00d83425e3a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Mike Silva Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Prototyping with Ada Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <916f75e2-4090-4348-ac96-968fbc122e72@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> References: <0d254195-50cb-4bad-b776-8d5c2ab09b6c@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <878wy9uyg9.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87zlqptajv.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <7f3435c6-bacb-4e02-a1de-2e73a417ba6c@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <87r6c0sei2.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87k5hsrqbi.fsf_-_@ludovic-brenta.org> <8e953413f88u9slj1es57kuegqdvn908ul@4ax.com> <2qDYj.118178$TT4.102662@attbi_s22> <48330c41$0$11193$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.51.178.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1211326238 6248 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2008 23:30:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.51.178.124; posting-account=QgO_5wkAAACZKtAvkb3f1VNDm9C58qLr User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:274 Date: 2008-05-20T16:30:37-07:00 List-Id: On May 20, 1:37=A0pm, "Peter C. Chapin" wrote: > Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > > Brooks, 1975: Plan to throw one away. This is accepted practice in HW. > > Is this really true? I don't see the people building large office > buildings throwing one away. > Brooks uses the analogy of a new chemical process where they will first build a pilot plant before building the full-scale plant. Lots of cutting edge stuff starts with a proof-of-concept unit. Not being an expert by any means, I'd say most office buildings are, at the engineering level, like most other office buildings. When they deviate too much then big problems do creep in. http://www-tech.mit.edu/V127/N53/lawsuit.html