From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f8311a3a7edd715 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-12 12:50:13 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!xfer13.netnews.com!netnews.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Ted Dennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Using "delay until" in real-time Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 20:40:48 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <9162gf$1or$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <915jl7$jt5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.48.27.130 X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Dec 12 20:40:48 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001207 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x64.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3009 Date: 2000-12-12T20:40:48+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Ken Garlington" wrote: > For our systems, we usually pick a base iteration rate that can be > accurately represented (64Hz is popular, although I've also seen 50Hz > and 80Hz). That would indeed be the smart way to do it. Unfortunately we have some algorithms that we have to match results with that *have* to run at 60Hz. Its Legacy Fortran code, written and controlled by developers at working for our customer who have little patience with this newfangled "Ada" stuff. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/