From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g8g2000pri.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Rick <rickduley@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Software Quality in Science
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <910d1fa3-694d-4dc4-8887-8afd54647955@g8g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <1198a288-b013-45a8-907f-7fe227e6294e@m27g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
	<04185bf3-f83a-4fbe-b380-c6d8aa4105e6@w27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	<ddb8b59c-d746-4228-b7a9-7ace7058018b@u26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<hkvdc2$as78$1@tr22n12.aset.psu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.3.183.148
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1265876993 26698 127.0.0.1 (11 Feb 2010 08:29:53
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:29:53 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g8g2000pri.googlegroups.com; posting-host=123.3.183.148;
	posting-account=q18aiAoAAADbiIPIlD5R8oYVGhuoBvVA
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	Trident/4.0; GTB6.4; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
	3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9104
Date: 2010-02-11T00:29:53-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bob Spooner wrote:
> In my experience, a lot of the problem with lack of improvement in software
> quality and reliability when using Ada results from developers writing Ada
> code the same way they write C. Then you don't get Ada's advantages and
> debugging is just as much of a problem as with C, with problem symptoms
> showing up far from the cause, etc. If Ada isn't used the way it was
> designed to be used, you get results similar to when you try to use a pair
> of pliers as a hammer.

Darrel Ince (in the Guardian article) gave us an insight into the
problem when he wrote of scientific software being:
"... produced by software engineers who have to undergo a regime of
thorough testing, quality assurance and a change control discipline
known as configuration management."

Two things are worth noting in that quotation:
1.  My reading in the field leads me to believe that "thorough
testing, quality assurance and a change control discipline" are pretty
thin on the ground in COTS software houses;
2.  There aren't a lot of Software Engineers around (if you emphasise
'Engineer').  Bear in mind that Engineering is an attitude, not a
qualification.

I believe that these are two of the foci Bob is looking for.  Good
luck, Bob.