From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE,
	TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!GTE.COM!diederich_r_%ncsd.dnet
From: diederich_r_%ncsd.dnet@GTE.COM (Ray Diederich, 301-869-8400)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Ada vs C++
Message-ID: <9106271705.AA13586@bunny.gte.com>
Date: 27 Jun 91 17:05:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: bunny.9106271705.AA13586
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>From _Defense_&_Aerospace_Electronics_, Vol. 1, Num. 1 (June 24, 1991), a
quote from Lloyd Mosemann, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force,
regarding the yet to be released case studies of Ada versus C++:

"Without Exception Ada won out in all categories of study," said Mosemann.
He said Ada's cost savings were 35% over C++'s, and maintenance savings
topped 70%.

(Reprinted without permission.)

Ray Diederich
**********
My employer would prefer that I had no opinions to express, especially any
that may have been expressed here.
**********