From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,db4d7e52353eb035,start X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.224.185.79 with SMTP id cn15mr2969955qab.4.1363353256866; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:14:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.131.103 with SMTP id ol7mr527219qeb.27.1363353256794; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Path: k8ni188qas.0!nntp.google.com!dd2no1345150qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2.230.82.82; posting-account=GfZx5woAAADTB-o-XOdlp4UQ5ID5xKzF NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.230.82.82 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <90bf1e05-3a48-498b-96f4-b16569c40618@googlegroups.com> Subject: Reverse engineering Ada's compiled code From: Dufr Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:14:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2013-03-15T06:14:16-07:00 List-Id: I have quite an unusual question to ask: how difficult would it be to reverse engineer Ada's compiled code? I am sure this question must have come up several times in some circles, given that many Ada projects pertain to very sensitive fields such as military applications, and the possibility that a piece of equipment falls in the wrong hands is always there. As a side question: are there any particular measures that one can take to make it harder for someone to reverse engineer Ada's compiled code? Thanks