From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8707:: with SMTP id y7mr16234740ioj.30.1546316964855; Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:29:24 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:24c3:: with SMTP id z61mr787299ota.1.1546316964702; Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:29:24 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.166.216.MISMATCH!q69no5294itb.0!news-out.google.com!v141ni29ita.0!nntp.google.com!q69no5293itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:29:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <697312a4-5b96-472e-ae50-3ae33232c4de@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.18.64.97; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.18.64.97 References: <73eb9d07-b3cf-4d3b-9802-eeb148a0c2e0@googlegroups.com> <0d16f930-33ce-4e62-bc63-4719199b4e02@googlegroups.com> <697312a4-5b96-472e-ae50-3ae33232c4de@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <908b28e9-0e45-4050-a3e2-7a33b9a4ab9d@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: ANTLR grammar for Ada available From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 04:29:24 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55145 Date: 2018-12-31T20:29:24-08:00 List-Id: On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 12:02:11 AM UTC-7, alby....@gmail.com wrote= : > Would anyone be interested in the ANTLR v4 grammar for Ada 2012, and a sa= mple C# sample / driver application to demonstrate the visitor/listener fea= tures of v4? Yes; though I do question a bit of the utility of C# sample/drivers here --= if you've got ANTLR popping out a DOTNET frontend, wouldn't it be easier t= o tie-in to the DOTNET backend? Or am I misunderstanding the set-up here? >=20 > I can post this up on GitHub if their is enough interest! That would be cool. >=20 > I appreciate an Ada runtime/sample would be far more appropriate, but giv= en that an Ada runtime for v4 does not yet exist, its the best I can do at = the moment. I was thinking about this a few years ago; in the context of a multilanguag= e environment/compiler -- In that sense, I was thinking a sort of "language= /IR for [language] runtimes" where the language's runtime is described ther= ein and 'linked' with the source from the various languages that are then f= ed to the backend.