From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7332b19c66a79eea X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!multikabel.net!newsfeed10.multikabel.net!post1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl!cache6.tilbu1.nb.home.nl!not-for-mail Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:04:27 +0100 From: Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Quantified Expressions: "some" References: <4ce31bb6$0$7670$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <2d44ff4d-b3ad-4593-8492-4d16fb6b6a2e@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <1t7pvrh3i022d.8t9yqjonagar$.dlg@40tude.net> <4ce3e3c3$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <13vas9njbsmps.1npsunlgz5n4z$.dlg@40tude.net> <949be87b-78a2-4e7b-8b38-40f57a69eb55@d20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <8kknp7FkqpU1@mid.individual.net> <4ce6b85d$0$6879$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <903d5$4d0dd8ac$541ece2c$2664@cache6.tilbu1.nb.home.nl> X-Complaints-To: abuse.home.news@prolocation.net Organization: @home NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.30.206.44 (84.30.206.44) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:04:28 +0100 X-Trace: 903d54d0dd8acf1bb6b8902664 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17014 Date: 2010-12-19T11:04:27+01:00 List-Id: On 11/19/2010 21:03, Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > Georg Bauhaus wrote: > >> (a) know that "=>" is just an arrow for associations(*), and >> >> (b) know that its very mirror, "<=" is defined at a very different >> linguistic level, that of relational operators. >> >> This *is* confusing (and is an opportunity for condescension of >> Him Who Knows Ada Well), even though this piece of obfuscation is old, >> if rarely used in the past. > > It's even more confusing if you know Ada's little sister VHDL, where the > "<=" actually is a signal assignment: > > .-- 8< -- > | if (Reset = '1') then > here ==> | Rnd_Out <= (others => '0'); > | elsif Rising_Edge (Clock) then > `-- 8< -- > > Or, if you already think that's funny, then take a look at a case > statement: > > -- 8< -- > case Input_Select is > when "00" => Output <= In (0); > [...] > when others => Output <= 'Z'; > end case; > -- 8< -- > or when "00" => Rnd_Out <= (others => '0')