From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c71d0b53277efb27
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.59.229 with SMTP id c5mr4127602pbr.6.1320888392507;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h5ni19030pba.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Rego, P." <pvrego@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Another question on class constructor
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <9024181.15.1320888318434.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbl36>
References: <19338900.553.1320719246503.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqpp12>
 <j9abcr$ld5$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <13650980.81.1320799254130.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqiu15>
 <m2ty6dbsvk.fsf@pushface.org>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@googlegroups.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.148.121.196
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1320888318 27946 127.0.0.1 (10 Nov 2011 01:25:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m2ty6dbsvk.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=200.148.121.196;
 posting-account=TRgI1QoAAABSsYi-ox3Pi6N-JEKKU0cu
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18896
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2011-11-09T17:25:18-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Have you done that?
Yes.

> I get the same here, also with GCC 4.6.0, but not with 4.7 [180524] so
> _may_ already be fixed in AdaCore's sources.
> 
> When you see a bug box like this, it's definitely a compiler error;
> whether it's because it doesn't handle your legal code, or because it
> fails to detect your illegal code and give a proper error report, it's
> still wrong!
I agree.