From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!TITAN.TSD.ARLUT.UTEXAS.EDU!steve From: steve@TITAN.TSD.ARLUT.UTEXAS.EDU (Steve Glicker) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Predicting Execution Times Message-ID: <9004061841.AA10939@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu> Date: 6 Apr 90 18:41:27 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet List-Id: In <66027@scrsip.UUCP> Steve Vestal writes: > It's possible to have the compiler predict performance for more than > just basic blocks using some control flow analysis (e.g. U. Toronto's > Realtime Euclid). ... We are _very_ interested in ways to predict the performance of real-time systems. I would greatly appreciate references to work in this area including the "U. Toronto's Realtime Euclid". If there is sufficient interest, I would be glad to post the responses. Steve Glicker Applied Research Laboratories (a department of) The University of Texas at Austin (steve@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu)