From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c56a86f3a4e16d06
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Wolfgang Jeltsch <jeltsch@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Containers with Ada
Date: 2000/11/20
Message-ID: <8vc903$5ab$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 695930289
References: <8v8pii$dvo$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A19172D.ACCA08BB@earthlink.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x67.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 212.162.20.114
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Nov 20 22:35:47 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDjeltsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.74 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586)
Date: 2000-11-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> Numerous generic packages for container types already exist--the
> original Booch components, the Ada 95 Booch components, the Ada
> Structured Library (my personal favorite), PragmAda, and so on.
Are any of them open source? If this is the case from where can I
download them? It would be interesting for me to see how they have
solved the "container problems".

> I would much rather see an individual extend Ada's reach into new
> fields in which there's little or no Ada presence, rather than
> reworking the same, tired old ground.
What fields do you think of?


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.