From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c56a86f3a4e16d06 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Containers with Ada Date: 2000/11/20 Message-ID: <8vbia5$g7l$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 695789273 References: <8v8pii$dvo$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8v8vbr$htl$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Nov 20 16:08:44 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001010 Date: 2000-11-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Brian Rogoff wrote: > I guess for my tastes these restrictions one inherits from the use of > controlled types with respect to nested subprograms makes their use > for container libraries problematic. I use nested subprograms a lot, Its not just controlled types, but derived tagged types in general. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.