From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b50bc6538a649497 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Portability accross compilers Date: 2000/11/20 Message-ID: <8vbfj7$dlu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 695775952 References: <8v9l58$210$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A18EA6E.4902F51@cadwin.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.240 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Nov 20 15:22:23 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-11-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3A18EA6E.4902F51@cadwin.com>, Nicolas Brunot wrote: > (I guess this doesn't deal any more with students homework) > I'd like to insist on the fact that portability is very > important, and that's right to recall that portability between > compilers is no exception. Absolutely! That's why we work to make sure that GtkAda is written as far as possible in entirely portable Ada. If you find exceptions, report them as bugs to the GtkAda public mailing list. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.