From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c56a86f3a4e16d06
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Containers with Ada
Date: 2000/11/19
Message-ID: <8v8vbr$htl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 695436892
References: <8v8pii$dvo$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x52.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.240
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Nov 19 16:32:59 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-11-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

It is by the way a definite limitation in Ada 95 that some
facilities of the language do not extend fully to nested
subprograms (though not quite as much a limitation as not
having nested subprograms at all, as in C or C++ :-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.