From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d3b94a943bad669
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.2 released
Date: 2000/11/12
Message-ID: <8um7t0$re8$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 692695067
References: <8uh0eq$nq1$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>
 <8uh9j8$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.240
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Nov 12 14:02:09 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-11-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8uh9j8$9aa1@news.cis.okstate.edu>,
  dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org wrote:
> There's no major breakage. The most recent version of Debian
> runs glibc 2.2 (2.1.97) and GNAT works just fine on it.

Indeed, and I am not sure what the "repeated" issue is about.
Yes, there was one big transition, that caused everyone pain,
but no one wants to repeat that!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.