From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b50bc6538a649497 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-11-09 16:10:12 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!xfer10.netnews.com!netnews.com!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: if statements Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:02:52 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Message-ID: <8ufdv8$ovi$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <200011091641.KAA05352@alonzo.tds-eagan.lmco.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.240 X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Nov 10 00:02:52 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x59.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.240 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:1967 Date: 2000-11-10T00:02:52+00:00 List-Id: In article <200011091641.KAA05352@alonzo.tds-eagan.lmco.com>, comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote: > We rarely need to forgive Robert for > technical errors, so I'm willing to cut him some slack here. Ahem! Message 22/77 in my newsreader (posted by Ken Garlington two days ago, first pointed out this obvious error). Not only do I of course notice an error like this, but I also read the entire thread before answering :-) :-) As I made clear, I was showing how to rewrite the offered solution (I quoted the original, and referred to the "above"). Since I was talking about style changes, I did not want to confuse things by making a substantive change since I assumed that everyone reading the thread was fully aware of it given Ken's post! By the way, you started a new thread (at least that's what my newsreader says) instead of following up the previous thread with this title (perhaps you are trying to foil those of us who do use threaded newsreaders, and are careful to read all messages in a thread before replying .... :-) So, no slack needed! > Another problem (as noted by some already) is that the > original problem asked for an if statement, not a procedure, > so we would need to trim Robert's solution down to the if > statement. Again, I was not trying to convince the doubting CLA hoardes that Robert Dewar could have successfully handed in a correct solution to this complex assignment, but rather I was making style comments on the particular procedure previously posted :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.