From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,119826e558c913d7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-11-04 20:50:08 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++ in defense projects Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 04:35:57 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Message-ID: <8u2o3d$hft$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <8tv04t$n80$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a04bb7a@rsl2.rslnet.net> <3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.37.79.194 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Nov 05 04:35:57 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x60.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 129.37.79.194 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:1800 Date: 2000-11-05T04:35:57+00:00 List-Id: In article <3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net>, "E. Robert Tisdale" wrote: > If you can find an Ada compiler which emits byte code for a > JVM, > you may be able to convince them that they should implement > safety critical applications in Ada instead of Java. > Otherwise, you should probably just forget about Ada. JGNAT from Ada Core Technologies is such a system .... Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies www.gnat.com Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.