From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8ffd9ca0013db6a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-11-04 20:40:06 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Redefined "=" = generic disaster? Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 04:26:06 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Message-ID: <8u2ngr$h28$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <39F13ED9.1EE@li.net> <39F1C092.87D4135E@acm.org> <39F1F686.26B5@li.net> <8tecab$epm$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39FCEFAD.56BE85B1@ix.netcom.com> <8tkfme$v8a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39FE3C35.64CBB3C7@ix.netcom.com> <8tn7s1$9gp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A005722.7E0BC50@mail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.37.79.194 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Nov 05 04:26:06 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x60.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 129.37.79.194 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:1798 Date: 2000-11-05T04:26:06+00:00 List-Id: In article <3A005722.7E0BC50@mail.com>, matsw@mail.com wrote: > I think there really is a problem with the reemergence of > predefined operations within generics, and that problem has > been acknowleged by the Ada 95 design team: draft versions of > the 9X reference manual had rules. Is that all we are talking about, the reemergence of predefined operators? I would not have guessed that (partly because I sort of assumed that anyone discussing the language design would be aware of this issue, and it certainly has been discussed to death!) OK, if that is the issue, then nothing more needs to be said! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.