From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6d1607a5397de6b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-10-31 09:50:09 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!205.252.116.205!howland.erols.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: mjsilva@my-deja.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is the Ada World Embarrassed by the Defense Industry?
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:39:01 GMT
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
Message-ID: <8tn03k$23d$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <VZgL5.34$pq3.5686@news.flash.net> <39FDE9E4.35F615A6@netwood.net>
 <39FE461D.275F1363@ix.netcom.com> <8tmt7o$vbj$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <39FEFBF8.D62508B8@netwood.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.169.137.75
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Oct 31 17:39:01 2000 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x63.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 206.169.137.75
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDmjsilva
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:1665
Date: 2000-10-31T17:39:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <39FEFBF8.D62508B8@netwood.net>,
  "E. Robert Tisdale" <edwin@netwood.net> wrote:
> mjsilva@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> > I'm still interested in hearing
> > if any of those who have switched from Ada
> > to The Radiant Future of language X
> > are finding that there's trouble in paradise X.
> > It seems that if there is trouble in paradise X
> > then we Ada advocates should be sure and document it
> > for the benefit of others who are considering such a switch,
> > or who are simply evaluating languages.
> > OTOH, if everybody is happy as a clam using X
> > then I guess we need to rethink some of our assumptions.
>
> Mike,
>
> We are talking about programming languages -- NOT religions.
> Aren't we?

Yep.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.