This is a typical case of "being right, but being dead".
You're right to say that an Ada programmer is forced to follow better
programming practices than your typical C programmer. However, I know at
least two companies that have rewritten the code of their software tools
from Ada to C++ mostly because they were not able to maintain a stable team
of Ada programmers at a reasonable cost (to be fair, there were also some
portability and compiler issues). Those Ada programmers were good, but
certainly not easy to find.
Pascal Obry
wrote in message
news:uy9z5tox1.fsf@der.edf.fr...
>
> Most of your message is nonsense to me. But others have already pointed
> this out. Let me just add:
>
> "E. Robert Tisdale" writes:
>
> > It is easier to find and train C and C++ programmers
> > than it is to find and train Ada programmers today
> > so there is a strong incentive to prefer C or C++ over Ada.
> >
>
> Maybe, but it is easier to find GOOD Ada programmers than C
> programmers. Ada programmers have a strong background on
> design, modularity, readability... at least they have heard
> about that!
>
> Pascal.
>
> --
>
> --|------------------------------------------------------------
> --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member |
> --| |
> --| EDF-R&D-MTI-NTIC- T A I C |
> --| Intranet: http://cln46gb |
> --| Bureau N-023 e-mail: p.obry@der.edf.fr |
> --| 1 Av G�n�ral de Gaulle voice : +33-1-47.65.50.91 |
> --| 92141 Clamart CEDEX fax : +33-1-47.65.50.07 |
> --| FRANCE |
> --|------------------------------------------------------------
> --|
> --| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
> --|
> --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"