From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ded6ba3fc5b87b66 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-10-26 07:50:11 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Ted Dennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: First time Ada has let me down Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 14:43:20 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Message-ID: <8t9fu5$hfh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <8FD7DEBEEsynoptikdamudderfuck@news> <8FD8A9ED5andrewloguecdcgycom@142.77.1.194> <39F7AC37.FF6445D@acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.48.27.130 X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Oct 26 14:43:20 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x68.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:1575 Date: 2000-10-26T14:43:20+00:00 List-Id: In article <39F7AC37.FF6445D@acm.org>, Jeff Carter wrote: > It's extremely rare to need to use addresses in all-Ada code except > when dealing with hardware, even in Ada 83. ... ..or in dealing with imported code and objects, which is what this case is. A binding to some C facility like TCP/IP and sockets is going to be chock full of addresses and/or Unchecked_Conversion's. (The "for use at" overlay makes me wince a bit though). The trick is to not export those ugly address-based interfaces past the bindings. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.