From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,31b3d1f7b3516357
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:09:22 -0600
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:08:10 -0500
From: Jeffrey Creem <jeff@thecreems.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Cannot initialize entities of limited type?
References: <eo83q9$fpi$1@cernne03.cern.ch> <45a7956e$1@news.post.ch>
In-Reply-To: <45a7956e$1@news.post.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <8t2l74-n79.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171
X-Trace: 
 sv3-hLcR93QHX9Nptj4B/H2RuKWB+JOT/GR7Fy7KOL6ZFSZC0bHhSLd8f7Blvwnx+Rk8oeCRTeZX4mKtl94!wqbk37j/NRyZJ35sPwE+qlIzHbV8z2Kd5quqEB49b1+oE47f1a99hbhoqFGExFO+xOyQPe9G4Qge!0qw=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8121
Date: 2007-01-12T14:08:10-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Martin Krischik wrote:

>>
>> $ gnatmake hello
>> gcc -c hello.adb
>> hello.adb:17:16: cannot initialize entities of limited type
>> gnatmake: "hello.adb" compilation error
>> $
>>
>> I got lost. What's wrong in the code above?
> 
> 
> You are using a new Ada 2005 feature which your compiler may not yet 
> support. Update your compiler or use:
> 
> procedure Constructor (X: in out T);
> 
> Martin

Ah.. Of course that is a pretty obvious response to the original 
question that I totally missed. Woops!