From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8276b2994037cd71 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Overloading "in" (was: disjoint ranges ?) Date: 2000/10/21 Message-ID: <8ss9c3$6li$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 684146462 References: <39E612C9.9BF98CD3@laas.fr> <8s59nu$ej4$1@news.huji.ac.il> <39E658A4.525AE881@acm.org> <39E6E890.3B13E7A9@laas.fr> <8s8iuk$q66$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39EBB984.F2F8905F@ix.netcom.com> <8sksl4$b6o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39EE6610.C91290B@acm.org> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x64.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.240 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Oct 21 14:31:31 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-10-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <39EE6610.C91290B@acm.org>, Jeff Carter wrote: > One possible syntax is > > function "in" (Left : T; Right : T range <>) return Boolean; > > Not that I'm advocating including this capability. > > -- > Jeff Carter > "You tiny-brained wipers of other people's bottoms!" > Monty Python & the Holy Grail Yes, well anyone can dream up syntax like this, but figuring out the semantics and how it fits into the rest of the language may be a mind boggling excercise in complexity introduction :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.