From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9cc9076c49da0ab3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: charlet@gnat.com Subject: Re: Ada, Qt & Swig Date: 2000/10/20 Message-ID: <8sp6os$qau$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 683738841 References: <971791272.88660@edh3> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 213.228.58.131 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Oct 20 10:28:48 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDarnaud_charlet Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.16 i686) Date: 2000-10-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Qt is a commercial product - more 'sellable' to the Ties. Also, there > does not exist a GTK/Embedded. :) GtkAda is a fully supported commercial product as already mentioned by others, and there exist actually several GTK/Embedded products. I suspect you will find the GtkAda path more effective than the Qt path in terms of efforts involved. Arno Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.