From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,29e947df2e56cc40 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-30 01:11:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What's it's name again? Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:21:17 +0200 Message-ID: <8sickuks7ravfjr0hknush4ua0iu5h8t66@4ax.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.111) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1028016675 34870257 212.79.194.111 (16 [77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27476 Date: 2002-07-30T10:21:17+02:00 List-Id: On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 23:47:38 GMT, Robert A Duff wrote: >The whole model here depends on the idea that the compiler can look at >the specs of all with'ed packages (including private parts), but not >their bodies. Pragma Inline breaks that model, which IMHO makes the >whole model suspect. I find it too, but simply cannot imagine how one could do it otherwise. Do you have any idea? --- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de