From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fca1b,5f8432149982f35e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfca1b,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f8432149982f35e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Armin Steinhoff <a-steinhoff@web_de>
Subject: Re: Ada and QNX
Date: 2000/10/17
Message-ID: <8sh6me0itr@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 682410084
References: <8r1i82$ri3$1@kujawiak.man.lodz.pl>
 <V_hB5.59429$dZ2.20181071@news3.rdc1.on.home.com>
 <8r5pe5$h70$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8FCDFD7EEnopenopena@63.209.170.206>
 <39EA6305.CD5CFE1F@ix.netcom.com> <39EA9161.6469DDE2@home.com>
 <39EB1BA2.B5F2BFDF@acm.org> <39EB283A.9F7B4F76@motorola.com>
 <39EB662D.F2C8B55B@acm.org> <8sg6g2$eur$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.os.qnx
Date: 2000-10-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8sg6g2$eur$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert says...
>
>In article <39EB662D.F2C8B55B@acm.org>,
>  Marin David Condic <mcondic.nospam@acm.org> wrote:
>

[ clip ... ]

>What arguments would impress management. Well try this on
>for size "Ada will help you achieve level 3 CMM more rapidly
>and realiably". I suspect this is definitely true, and I could
>(and have) written papers to support this, but I would be
>interested in other people's viewpoints. 

ADA is in the meantime based on a IEC standard ... but who is controlling
the validation rules ??  I can only find an IEC paper for the issue
'Conformity assessment of a language processor', 25 pages. It is from 1999!!

I wonder when will the validation games are over??  =:-/ 

Armin