From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,66bc6b039f1e005d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Three simple questions Date: 2000/10/16 Message-ID: <8sfhtr$sjh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 682154533 References: <2BED68CA963D6D55.A78776F656DA0452.75A61ED22116F1B6@lp.airnews.net> <39e2588f.21565740@news.demon.co.uk> <39E2D51E.D0122F20@bton.ac.uk> <8s0b78$2no$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8s8jmo$qt0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39EB0761.4204C9ED@planet8.tds-eagan.lmco.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x54.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Oct 16 18:37:47 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-10-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <39EB0761.4204C9ED@planet8.tds-eagan.lmco.com>, James Hassett wrote: > (It seems a bit ironic that while the Ada language itself is > not case sensitive, many of its advocates--myself > included--are quite sensitive to the distinction between "Ada" > and "ADA"!) > > - Jim Hassett Actually this makes perfect sense. Typical Ada folks would be very unhappy at having the two identifiers Ada and ADA around in the same program, but if the indentifier were declared as Ada, then all references should use the same spelling. SO in fact the position is actually quite consistent, even though it appears not to be at first sight :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.