From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,66bc6b039f1e005d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Three simple questions
Date: 2000/10/14
Message-ID: <8sa596$s9n$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 681431087
References: 
 <2BED68CA963D6D55.A78776F656DA0452.75A61ED22116F1B6@lp.airnews.net>
 <x7vhf6j9ab8.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x59.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.240
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Oct 14 17:31:18 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-10-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <x7vhf6j9ab8.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk>,
  Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>   if False
>     -- stuff
>   end if


And then add some comments to explain why you did this, there
is nothing worse than seeing commented out code with no
explanation whatsoever of WHY it is commented out. Yet that
is in my experience quite a common occurrence in some code!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.