From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fca1b,5f8432149982f35e X-Google-Attributes: gidfca1b,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f8432149982f35e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Armin Steinhoff Subject: Re: Ada and QNX Date: 2000/09/29 Message-ID: <8r25kg0ujl@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 675534074 References: <8r1i82$ri3$1@kujawiak.man.lodz.pl> <8r1uc0$dve$1@pyrite.mv.net> Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com] Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.os.qnx Date: 2000-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <8r1uc0$dve$1@pyrite.mv.net>, "Jeff says... > >There is not really a full stable GCC port to QNX available so a GNAT port >would probably need to finish/clean that up first.... That's probably just your opinion ... you can't have any deeper experiences with QRTP. AFAIK ... the gcc sources are not yet available for QRTP, so you can't build GNAT yet. >I do not know of any other Ada 95 ports to that OS either. Really ? What ports to so called 'fine RTOSes' do you have in mind ?? Regards Armin