From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cf7bb651bfb9d65c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-28 22:30:07 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!feed.news.nacamar.de!news.belwue.de!news.bawue.de!lemmies.lb.bawue.de!not-for-mail
From: lemchens@lemmies.lb.bawue.de (arvids lemchens)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT Ada.Numerics.Aux question
Date: 29 Jul 2003 07:17:00 +0200
Organization: A poorly-maintained Debian GNU/Linux InterNetNews site
Sender: news@pd9018063.dip.t-dialin.net
Message-ID: <8qmUYbvkACB@lemmies.lb.bawue.de>
References: <ed66a020.0307281917.333e3587@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9018063.dip.t-dialin.net
X-Trace: pc3.dv-lemchens.de 1059455868 12793 192.168.2.6 (29 Jul 2003 05:17:48
 GMT)
User-Agent: OpenXP/32 v3.8.7pl1 (Linux) beta @ 2002-08-04-1436f
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40926
Date: 2003-07-29T07:17:00+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hello John,

happysegfault@yahoo.com am 28.07.03 um 20:17 in comp.lang.ada:
> I'm trying out GtkAda 2.2.0 on my Red Hat 9 system using gcc 3.2.2,

Compilerrelated Problem?

> -- test_sin.adb

ich@pc3:~$ gm test_sin.adb

GNATMAKE 3.14p (20010503) Copyright 1995-2001 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.
  "test_sin.ali" being checked ...
  -> "test_sin.adb" time stamp mismatch
gnatgcc -c -gnatE -gnatf -gnato -gnatwa test_sin.adb
test_sin.adb:2:18: warning: "ada.numerics.aux" is an internal GNAT unit
test_sin.adb:2:18: warning: use of this unit is non-portable and
version-dependent
End of compilation
gnatbind -x test_sin.ali
gnatlink test_sin.ali
ich@pc3:~$ ./test_sin
1.41421356237309505E+00
4.99999616987255739E-01
5.00000E-01
ich@pc3:~$

Wondering if Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions wouldn't be a
better choice than ada.numerics.aux?

And if not, why?

MvfG,

Arvids